コントラクト、ウォレットフロー、運用レイヤー全体における現在のプロトコル状態
現在の4TEENシステムは、単一のトークンコントラクトにとどまらない広がりを持っています。現在は、直接ミントロジック、コントローラー側の所有権、スケジュールされた流動性実行、Vaultによるカストディ、ウォレット主導の確認フロー、そしてオペレーター支援型のアンバサダー決済レイヤーを組み合わせています。
現在の4TEENシステムは、単一のトークンコントラクトにとどまらない広がりを持っています。現在は、直接ミントロジック、コントローラー側の所有権、スケジュールされた流動性実行、Vaultによるカストディ、ウォレット主導の確認フロー、そしてオペレーター支援型のアンバサダー決済レイヤーを組み合わせています。
ホワイトペーパードキュメント
以下のテキストは、読み物としてのドキュメント形式で表示されます。現行版と履歴版は分離されているため、アーカイブを書き換えることなく、公開中のドキュメントを更新できます。
Version: 1.4 • Date: May 4, 2026
4TEEN is a TRON protocol built around direct contract minting, per-purchase token locks, controller-side ownership, scheduled liquidity execution, and an operator-assisted ambassador settlement flow. This document is based on the current smart-contract repository, the current wallet app repository, and the public protocol routes as they stand on May 4, 2026.
4TEEN
TRC-20 token on TRON with 6 decimals and direct contract minting.
Buy
Users send TRX into the token contract and receive newly minted 4TEEN under a fixed 14-day lock.
FourteenController
Acts as the owner-side control layer for token administration, referral state, buyer binding, and reward accounting.
6.43%
FourteenLiquidityController can release 6.43% of its balance at most once per UTC day, subject to a 100 TRX minimum threshold.
Broader than 4TEEN only
The current wallet app is not a single-purpose buy screen. It includes portfolio, custom-token management, history, swap, unlock, liquidity, ambassador, and protocol-information surfaces.
4TEEN started as a direct-buy token with a fixed lock and fixed TRX routing. In its current form, that base still exists, but the active system around it is more structured. The protocol now combines a token contract, a controller contract, a liquidity controller, DEX-specific executors, purpose-separated vaults, a wallet application, and a backend settlement layer for ambassador processing.
The key distinction is important:
This document describes the system as it currently exists across those connected layers. It is not a price promise and it is not an investment claim.
The 4TEEN token itself does not generate profit. Market price depends on liquidity, demand, and external market behavior. The contract purchase price applies only to direct buys through the token contract.
4TEEN is not just a landing page, a token ticker, or a direct-buy button. The current architecture is a modular TRON system with deliberately separated responsibilities.
At the center sits the token contract. Around it sit the controller layer, the liquidity release layer, DEX-specific execution contracts, reserve vaults, and the wallet application that exposes those mechanics to users. On top of that, the ambassador flow now includes a real settlement pipeline that bridges first-touch attribution, backend verification, resource gating, and final controller-side reward accrual.
That broader shape matters because reading only the token contract no longer gives the full operational picture. The token is still the protocol entry point, but it is no longer the whole protocol surface.
This whitepaper is written from the current repository state as of May 4, 2026.
Primary sources used:
This document intentionally distinguishes between three categories of truth:
These are the mechanics that execute or revert on-chain:
These are user-facing steps in the wallet app:
These are backend and operator workflows:
When these categories differ, contract state remains the final authority for balances, locks, routing, processed purchases, and reward accrual.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Fourteen Token |
| Symbol | 4TEEN |
| Blockchain | TRON |
| Standard | TRC-20 |
| Decimals | 6 |
| Issuing Time | November 23, 2025 (UTC) |
4TEEN is a transferable on-chain token implemented as a TRC-20 asset on TRON.
The token contract is intentionally narrow in purpose:
The current contract repository shows an initial deployment mint of 10,102,022 4TEEN to the owner side of the system. Beyond that, new supply is created only when users call buyTokens() and send TRX into the direct-buy route.
There are no periodic emissions, no staking rewards, no yield minting, and no burn model in the current contract layer.
Total supply and circulating usability are not the same thing. Tokens may exist on-chain while still being locked or held in reserve vaults.
The current wallet app treats direct buy as a dedicated product flow.
Before execution, the wallet reads and prepares:
After review, the wallet sends a payable call to:
buyTokens()
That transaction does three things atomically when successful:
1. mints new 4TEEN 2. creates a fresh 14-day lock entry for that purchase 3. routes incoming TRX by the fixed protocol split
The wallet app also exposes confirmation-specific context that matters in practice:
This means the buy flow is no longer just “send TRX and hope.” The current wallet surface explains the contract state before signing.
Base deployment price:
1 TRX = 1 4TEEN
The token contract stores:
tokenPriceannualGrowthRatelastPriceUpdatepriceUpdateIntervalThe current repositories show:
The price update model is compounded by elapsed periods. The token contract exposes getCurrentPrice(), while the controller contract exposes a read-side preview path for current price calculation without needing to rewrite stored state first.
This mechanism affects only direct contract minting. It does not set or guarantee DEX market price.
Every direct buy creates a separate lock entry with:
Each lock lasts 14 days from purchase time.
Transferability is enforced through the available-balance rule:
available balance = total balance − locked balance
If a transfer exceeds the unlocked portion, it reverts.
The current wallet app does more than hold the lock silently. It includes unlock visibility surfaces that read:
That matters because the protocol is intentionally split between the contract rule and the user’s ability to inspect the rule.
The current architecture documents this split:
The older single-contract interpretation of “7% to owner” is now expressed through controller ownership. In the current architecture described by the smart-contract repository, the token contract is not owned by an externally operated wallet. It is owned by FourteenController.
That distinction matters because it changes what the 7% rail means in practice:
The controller contract explicitly tracks:
unallocatedPurchaseFundsownerAvailableBalancetotalReservedRewardsSo the direct-buy rail now feeds not only administration, but also the current ambassador accounting model.
The current contracts repository describes a two-stage liquidity model.
This means “liquidity exists” and “liquidity executes now” are separate states.
Liquidity timing is therefore rule-bounded, not user-impulsive.
The current system does not send raw TRX into DEX contracts blindly.
The execution path is:
1. LiquidityBootstrapper checks whether execution is available 2. it calculates the token-side amounts needed by each DEX executor 3. it pulls 4TEEN from FourteenVault 4. it prepares executor balances 5. it triggers FourteenLiquidityController 6. controller releases TRX and splits it 50 / 50
Current execution targets:
The bootstrapper exists because the DEXes do not share the same liquidity format:
The separation keeps DEX-specific logic out of the token core.
The liquidity path is permissionless in the sense that execution does not depend on a privileged wallet alone.
It is still bounded by on-chain conditions:
Automation may trigger this flow, but automation does not define those rules.
The current wallet repository shows a larger TRON wallet surface around 4TEEN, not just a protocol microsite in app form.
Current wallet-side capabilities include:
The manage-crypto layer is especially important because it shows that the app is not built as “4TEEN only.” The wallet stores default visible assets such as TRX, 4TEEN, and USDT, but also supports a broader custom-token catalog and history-derived token fallback handling.
That broader asset behavior is part of the current product reality.
The current wallet app exposes a dedicated swap route that:
The current swap service uses:
The dedicated 4TEEN-focused path currently centers on exit routes such as 4TEEN → TRX and 4TEEN → USDT. At the same time, the broader wallet asset layer proves that the product itself is not limited to one token.
This distinction matters:
That is a real product advantage and should be described as such.
The current controller contract contains ambassador state directly on-chain:
Reward ladder:
Buyer thresholds:
The current wallet app backend shows a more advanced purchase-reconciliation model than earlier whitepapers described.
Current flow in practice:
1. a direct-buy transaction is detected from token events 2. a purchase ID is derived from tx hash and buyer wallet 3. referral candidate data can be resolved from slug capture 4. existing buyer binding is checked on-chain 5. the backend checks whether allocation resources are above a safe floor 6. if resources are sufficient, it calls recordVerifiedPurchase() 7. if resources are insufficient, the purchase can remain preserved for replay 8. a later replay flow can allocate the purchase once resources recover
This is a crucial distinction:
processedPurchasesIn other words, the current system is operationally safer than a naive “must settle immediately or lose attribution” model.
Current vault contracts:
| Vault | Role |
|---|---|
| FourteenVault | liquidity token reserve |
| AirdropVault | community distribution reserve |
| TeamLockVault | team allocation lock custody |
Repository funding references currently document:
The role of these vaults is custody and separation, not policy invention. They do not define minting, buy pricing, or liquidity timing. They keep reserve functions partitioned.
The current controller layer can:
The current system does not expose a clean arbitrary-mint function in the controller layer, and it does not expose a user-lock bypass in the token-transfer rule set.
Important distinction:
Governance in 4TEEN means contract-defined operational control, not token-holder voting.
The current system has three public-facing layers:
When these layers disagree, the order of truth should be read like this:
1. on-chain contracts 2. verified on-chain events 3. operator/API state used for continuity 4. frontend presentation
The frontend is useful. It is not authoritative over token state.
| Component | Link |
|---|---|
| FourteenToken | FourteenToken |
| FourteenController | FourteenController |
| FourteenLiquidityController | FourteenLiquidityController |
| LiquidityBootstrapper | LiquidityBootstrapper |
| LiquidityExecutorSunV3 | LiquidityExecutorSunV3 |
| LiquidityExecutorJustMoney | LiquidityExecutorJustMoney |
| FourteenVault | FourteenVault |
| AirdropVault | AirdropVault |
| TeamLockVault | TeamLockVault |
The stronger reading of 4TEEN is this:
If a behavior is not visible in code or in verified contract state, it should not be treated as guaranteed protocol behavior.
Current strengths in the design:
Remaining risks still exist:
This document should not be read as a claim of zero risk or guaranteed uptime.
4TEEN is not:
It is better described as:
Final principle: if a behavior is not enforced by deployed contracts or clearly implemented in the current operating code, it should not be represented as a protocol guarantee.
バージョンのタイムライン
V1.4が現行のホワイトペーパーです。V1.3、V1.2、V1.1、V1.0は、それぞれ専用ルート上に保存された履歴ドキュメントとして引き続き利用できます。
バージョン 1.3
履歴
流動性の自動化、アンバサダー運用、コントラクトと運用レイヤー全体にわたるより広いシステム視点を含む、拡張版のプロトコルペーパーです。
バージョン 1.2
履歴
トークンルール、コントローラー実行、Vault、検証を1つの長文ドキュメントに統合した、プロトコル形式のホワイトペーパーです。
バージョン 1.1
履歴
最初のトークノミクスペーパーと、その後のプロトコル形式のホワイトペーパーをつなぐ橋渡しとなるバージョンです。
バージョン 1.0
履歴
固定エントリー、需要主導の供給、短期ロックサイクル、自動的な流動性転送を中心に据えた、最初に公開されたトークノミクスペーパーです。